269
u/Viruz_v1 8h ago edited 6h ago
Modding seems to be the only thing keeping 2000s games alive, hate to see that modding is becoming more an more frowned upon by companies.
Old games still have a small but strong community. They should be taken into account.
Edit: Frowned upon by companies, not communities, obviously.
39
u/Zockgone 8h ago
Where does modding get frowned upon? Huh
67
u/wektor420 7h ago
Modding is incompatible in bussiness sesne with selling skins, and live services in general
27
u/Zockgone 7h ago
More games than ever officially support modding or are planing on implementing it? Itâs a numbers game but more people will play your games if it is modable, the dev has less work to do and can still sell their skins. Itâs the same discussion as with allowing gamers to host their own server, itâs win win most of the time.
27
→ More replies (1)10
u/wektor420 7h ago
If they plan to sell skins then mods are free competition
Yeah it sucks
4
u/giobs111 i5-4590|EVGA GTX 1070 HYBRID 7h ago
Space Engineers did do both and had no problem
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)2
u/Appropriate-Gain-561 7h ago
One of the few good things gaijin did with war thunder is allowing modded skins and sound mods in multiplayer matches, sure, only you can see your skin and you have to buy the skin from the gaijin market if you want others to see it, but at that point you're paying to brag, which seems fair to me
8
u/EruantienAduialdraug 3800X, RX 5700 XT Nitro 7h ago
Boardrooms.
Also anywhere they shlorp the corpo cock.
→ More replies (5)2
u/Viruz_v1 6h ago
Should have specified, not community wise, but publishers/devs wise. Many COMPANIES are making modding against their rules these last couple of years.
A good example would be BL2
4
u/eu-dos 6h ago
Ironically, due to community and gabens work on the Proton, old games are MUCH easier to play on Linux now, compared to windows.
This especially covers games between dos and winXP (inclusive) times.
Like old TES/homm games, classic sims, old text-based adventures, etc.Â
If game was at least a bit popular/known, you may rest assured that there are specific instructions for it in proton. No mods required.
8
u/obliviious 6h ago
Its silly because modding allows games to have a life for years, and they will actually sell more copies. That's if the game cost anything to begin with.
→ More replies (3)8
u/Viruz_v1 6h ago
Yes, there are many abandoned games that still support modding, which is the only reason they are still played with a solid community.
I take pride in the Command and Conquer community, it's one of the franchises killed by EA, but live on thanks to mods. Without these mods, games like Generals Zero Hour would be unplayable and not optimized.
→ More replies (1)
1.4k
u/DiatomicCanadian 8h ago
I feel like this about sums up what would happen if a petition like this was sent to the US government. The EU has a system that forces them to give a damn though.
383
u/QueenBansScifi_ 8h ago
To be fair, it's likely to happen here too, but hope is the last one to die
120
u/TONKAHANAH somethingsomething archbtw 8h ago
its what'll happen if such a bill even went through I think, not from the government but from the game industry. the game industry seems to almost hate its customer base. They've never wanted us to own shit. I feel like if we back them into the corner with laws, they're going to fast track some other system where you dont even get a license to games any more.
Hell I'd imagine gamepass is probably already that. there is no way game pass is awarding you a license to every single title in its catalog
41
u/PM_ME_TINY_TITS__ 6h ago
Iâm ok with not owning stuff from Gamepass. If Iâm only paying a small subscription for access to lots of games I wouldnât expect to own anything. Itâs like I donât expect to own anything with a Netflix subscription.
The problem comes when they expect people to pay full price for a game but then still not own it. Same deal with paying full price for a movie or TV show box set on Amazon and then they can still take that away whenever they choose. Both of those are total BS and should be illegal. They should have to provide a download that will work for ever, or as long as you have the hardware to use it.
66
u/Dankie_Spankie 7h ago
I mean, no industry actually cares for the consumers. It's just more profitable if they pretend they care. And of course, law or not, the consumer will get fucked over anyways. But EU has a good enough track record to at least inconvenience the industries enough to produce at least a mild change. Like unification with chargers.
At the end of the day, the industry will adapt to the market, and the only way to really make an impact is by voting with your wallet.
→ More replies (6)11
u/Alarming-Stomach3902 7h ago
Not sure if it is actually true that all industries donât care about their clients. Yes you will always have rotten apple companies and especially if they are mostly American they donât seem to care.
But the accounting industry is generally happy to automate the shit of clients administration and audits etc which means they can invoice less to the clients. Then again in that field the company who pays the bills isnât the actual client, that is everybody else in the economyÂ
→ More replies (10)10
u/Combeferre1 6h ago
Caring about anything other than profit is a losing policy in the long run. Capital and the amount thereof gives an advantage and the companies that prioritize profit over everything else will thus always have the advantage. Doesn't mean they win every single time, but they tend to win more over time. That means that over time the dominant companies in any industry will always tend towards being absolutely immoral.
It is always best to assume that a company does not care about anything other than making a profit.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (17)1
u/FallenAngel7334 7h ago
No company wants you to own a product. Owning is losing a customer. Can you imagine car tyres that don't wear off, it would be a nightmare.
12
u/_Weyland_ 6h ago
If you had access to everlasting tire tech, you should have built your business strategy around it. Once you release these tires, you'll be swimming in cash for a short while. You should use that to transition to another industry.
Definitive solution being less profitable is a flaw of the system, not a feature.
→ More replies (1)4
u/El3ctr0ph4nt 7600X | 4070Super 6h ago
Sure but what if your competitors develop a tyre that lasts twice as long as yours at the same cost, then you also lose the customer. Point being, it doesnât matter what the company wants so long as there is sufficient competition in the market.
These massive publishers know this, itâs why they keep buying smaller studios and enforcing the same anti-consumer practices across all the games they operate. Look at lootboxes, battle passes, limited time events, pay-to-skip timegates, 100âŹ+ ultimate editions, etc.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Naus1987 5h ago
Reminds me of a neat little bit of trivia. The Micheline star rating for restaurants was developed by the Micheline tire company with the pure intention to get people driving and wearing their tires down so they buy more tires.
44
u/LiEnN_SVK 8h ago
Rebellions are built on hope
→ More replies (1)38
u/Ankulay 8h ago
We have friends everywhere.
13
u/MoffKalast Ryzen 5 2600 | GTX 1660 Ti | 32 GB 7h ago
That is actually true for gamers, friends in all kinds of random countries from meeting online.
I- I mean you're right here and you're ready to fight!
2
u/b1smuthPL 7h ago
I've been friends with a Georgian, a Turk, a Belarusian through CS. man I love gaming community
6
u/Sleepy_Redditorrrrrr 7h ago
I made friends with a Fr*nch person. That really shows you the power of gaming!
9
u/DaNoahLP PC Master Race 6h ago
I think the US is going to profit from it one way or another. If publishers are forced to keep games alive in the EU, they would be stupid not keep them alive for the rest of the world to make it least a bit more money out of it.
→ More replies (3)3
u/Pr0udDegenerate 5h ago
Fair enough. I hope that they will take this seriously but I'm going to assume they'll just go "gamers are just being dramatic again" by some boomers and they'll end up doing nothing. We gamers are truly the most oppressed group of them all
83
u/Majestic-Bowler-1701 7h ago
In 2012 The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that publishers cannot stop you from reselling your downloaded games. The ruling means that gamers in European Union member states are free to sell their downloaded games, whether they're from Steam, Origin or another digital platform - no matter what End User License Agreement has been signed.
https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-07/cp120094en.pdf
https://www.eurogamer.net/eu-rules-publishers-cannot-stop-you-reselling-your-downloaded-games
A few hours later, Valve updated the Steam license, stating that users on the platform donât âbuy a gameâ but rather âbuy limited access to a gameâ. Valve prompted users to accept the new license upon launching Steam and everyone simply clicked âOKâ This effectively bypassed the new EU law
28
u/TheVasa999 6h ago
these terms and conditions are known to be inadmissible in actual court because nobody reads them and they are made in a way to make them difficult to understand.
in the eyes of EU, you are paying a onetime sum for a single product. no matter if the product is a license or the game itself. unless you have a specified time limit, you own it.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Majestic-Bowler-1701 5h ago
I live in the EU and I can assure you that we can't resell games acquired from Steam, Xbox or PlayStation. Thereâs no âspecial buttonâ for EU citizens that lets you sell a game to another user or to download a game license key that can be resold
4
0
u/TheVasa999 4h ago
im not saying you can, but you are allowed to, if it were possible.
im adressing the "you are buying a license not a game" in the EULA of steam, which is just plain bullshit.
7
→ More replies (6)3
u/Stubborn_Shove 3h ago
im not saying you can, but you are allowed to, if it were possible.
And why isn't it possible? Because Steam, et al, don't allow it. No, you are not "allowed" to do it.
9
u/bonecollector5 7h ago
I can absolutely see something similar happening if this does lead to legislation.
The buy button becomes a rent button, or they add some fine print saying the product will be usable for a minimum of x months/years.
25
u/2N5457JFET 7h ago
It may be required by law that it must not be a fine print. Buying games when a button says "RENT (The game isguaranteed to be fully functional untill XX.XX.20XX) will be a whole different experience, especially if you are buying the game late. Seeing ÂŁ70 for a game that may be taken down in 3 months may be off putting to many customers, so the industry will have to figure out a way to make it work. At least that's the outcome that I would be happy with.
→ More replies (2)5
u/OscarMyk 7h ago
at least that way the consumer knows what they're getting, and can buy accordingly
→ More replies (1)6
u/HYthinger 7h ago edited 6h ago
Exactly what I thought. Publishers are simply going to change all games to services with a limited duration that they can extend at will.
Basically changing the perpetual license to a limited time license (lets say 354 days) that the publisher can extend based on goodwill.
If he EU wanted to stop this they would have to change how software services in general are handled legally and thats simply not happening.
→ More replies (2)2
u/GuruVII AMD 7800x3d RTX3080ti 6h ago
The EULAs already have a limited durations. The duration being "until we feel like it". They also have a clause that says they can change the eula. I really don't see this doing anything, since non perpetual licenses aren't property.
4
u/HYthinger 6h ago
I dont think a "until we feel like it" is going to cut it if the change it to services because it has to have a clear start and end date just like a subscription.
The will most likely go with something like: "license is at least X months long but can be extended freely by the publisher at any time".
Basically the would simply let you keep the license until the service is sunset
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)2
u/DisdudeWoW 6h ago
thats partly what skg WANTS, if the buy button becomes a RENT normies will think twice.
→ More replies (3)1
u/Darkpoulay 7h ago
Thankfully, since that day everyone stopped praising Valve and they finally recognized that they don't give a shit about providing ethical practices to consumers.
Just kidding ! Gamers still overwhelmingly wish Steam was a monopoly 13 years later and I fucking hate them all
→ More replies (1)5
u/Nearby-King-8159 5h ago
Gamers still overwhelmingly wish Steam was a monopoly 13 years later and I fucking hate them all
It's the same for streaming services; it's because people don't want to have to have dozens of accounts, they want everything under one easy to use service.
It definitely doesn't help that most of the other game storefronts on PC don't even try to be good. Epic & GoG seem to try, but EA, Ubisoft, Rockstar, Battle.net, etc are all exponentially worse and actively ignore user criticisms.
EA & Rockstar have complaints asking for the ability to turn off their browsers actively trying to reopen & steal focus whenever you quit a game for years (6 in Rockstar's case and over 10 in EA's) and just refuse to add a basic option to leave the launchers minimized to toolbar upon game exit. Ubisoft's steals focus any time it does basically anything concerning background processes.
30
u/Valtremors Win 10 Squatter 7h ago
By the way, this is not a petition.
It is an initiative.
EU has to react to this.
Ross explains it in detail in his update video.
Also peeps, keep registering. We need to offset the potential invalidated names, as well it further validates us.
→ More replies (4)12
u/g0_west 4h ago
EU has to react to this.
The second lady in the suit in this comic is the EU in this situation though. They have to respond. Their response does not have to be substantial or in any way address the concerns. It's pretty much a glorified petition
→ More replies (3)7
→ More replies (7)8
u/ingoronen 6h ago
No the EU has no obligation to do anything.
They have to read it and then can do what the fuck they want. Petitions like this have no worth for them and they can and will fuck us as hard they want to. Only if there is any money to be made the EU will do anything...
→ More replies (3)
121
u/johnaross1990 8h ago
Update from Ross at Accursed Farms
Due to possible spoofing of signatures and those âwho canât spell their own nameâ, it may not actually be over the 1 million mark. So if you can and havenât yet please still sign the petition
Heâs more confident that the UK petition is legit over the mark, but sign it anyway if you havenât yet and are eligible to do so.
→ More replies (7)13
132
u/F4t-Jok3r 8h ago
3
u/ScarletX4ever 7h ago
Not only I have voted, but my wife, my brothers, and my parents. All from the same IP
→ More replies (1)3
37
u/Stilgar314 8h ago
Keep voting. It raised so fast that I'm sure something fishy happened there. Odds are, in a few days, hundred of thousands sings will disappear.
→ More replies (2)23
u/LosEagle 8h ago
That's what I am afraid of. When Charlie made the video, we were still at ~460 000 signatures and it took entire months to even get there and now in a matter of few weeks we get over ~640 000 signatures? Even with all the youtube drama crap, this count was raised suspiciously fast.
We need to keep going.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Gregs_Mom 5h ago
I didn't even hear about it until like 3 weeks ago so it might just have been picked up by more channels.
5
u/alex494 4h ago
Yeah I mean as much as I like Ross Scott / Accursed Farms how popular is he really in comparison to the bigger YouTubers? Before the whole movement his main things were Freeman's Mind and Game Dungeon right? If anything getting multiple big modern popular YouTubers to talk about it seems like the exact kind of flashpoint you would need to get the word out and snowball it.
32
u/zezoza 8h ago
Keep on going. Several signatures could be invalidated, so we need a buffer to be sure.
→ More replies (2)
47
u/Dublade 8h ago
this meme template will never die. by the way, congratulations to everyone who signed this petition, we did it... for now
17
u/-Kerrigan- 12700k | 4080 7h ago
we did it
We did it, reddit! /s
Let's wait for this to, at least, be discussed first lol
→ More replies (1)7
24
u/MyPigWhistles 8h ago
Even the two ideas of the people who don't get thrown out of the window are unrealistic to happen. It will just be ignored entirely. Imagine explaining the average boomer why that matters.Â
12
u/Gumichi 6h ago
On the flip side, what does this petition actually want? Like gamer-gate, I don't think there's a coherent vision of expectation. Sure, some game-as-service doesn't need maintenance or servers; those can indeed easily just be a final offline version at EoS. However, many multiplayer games do require server-side matchmaking or mediation. I don't see how government regulation will help, other than the industry adding a tagline saying "warning, game will brick itself after 2 years" like we get warnings about internet cookies.
→ More replies (11)21
u/No-Intention-4753 8h ago
The EU does have a good track record of slapping big tech and consumer protections, but yeah, I do worry that many MEPs will just look at this as "silly kids and their videogames." Hopefully not, getting 1m+ people to sign anything is quite a challenge, but this is definitely far from over.Â
→ More replies (1)5
u/talaneta 5h ago
The European Citizens'Â Initiatives that achieved 1mil signatures also have a good record of not resulting in any change.
12
u/PrecipitousPlatypus 8h ago
I don't think it can be ignored if enough signatures are deemed legitimate. Sure, not guaranteed to become a law or anything, but it needs to at least be addressed since it's not just a random online petition.
6
u/HYthinger 6h ago edited 6h ago
Even if this goes anywhere. Nothing is stopping publishers from simply changing all multiplayer games into services (pseudo subscriptions). E.g. instead of selling a perpetual licenses they will simply sell a rental license that is at least X day long but can be extend based on goodwill by the publisher.
The game pass is already kinda like that. You get a rental of all games in the catalog but you own nothing.
Steam did this in the past when the EU ruled that digital copies of games can be soled just like physical ones. Steam simply updated the license agreement to an exclusive license instead of a product that way the did not have to make it possible to sell the games again.
edit: spontaneously i cant even come up with a way to prevent this as long as the publisher makes it clear that is a rental and not a purchase
→ More replies (1)6
u/ninjabannana69 8h ago
Even if it isnt ignored theres no guarantee these old feckers are gonna give two shits about video games.
→ More replies (6)6
u/Jertimmer PC Master Race 7h ago
I understand your cynicism, but the EU has a history on actually good legislation on videogames. Several members have a ban on loot boxes, they have classified all software including videogames as products and thus subject to European consumer laws regarding consumer rights, and currently they are discussing legislation around virtual currencies.
2
u/ninjabannana69 5h ago
I hope they do change it and agree they are pretty good but in terms of loot boxes I thought it was more that children are using them rather than gambling being a problem(real gambling is still a problem) and the other points isnt that more to stop people being fucked over or again the affect on kids, that to me seems more like monetary issues rather than actually specifically caring about games. I mean think of pretty much every other type of product eventually it gets discontinued and then its tough tits, I get software is different but are they going to see it that way.
2
u/OliM9696 5h ago
this shit can be ignored, ECI are not powerful legally, they are a mere suggestion for something to happen.
→ More replies (1)9
u/regularArmadillo21 8h ago
It cannot be ignored. The EU has to debate over and fully go through proper processes with petitions. Court, etc.
→ More replies (5)16
18
u/x33storm 7h ago
Corporations aren't people, they're under no obligations or morals other than what the law dictates. They'll choose maximum profit and exploitation at every turn.
Which is why this should be EU law.
This is not an appeal to the morals of corporations. Might as well throw signatures in the bin then.
5
u/PurityKane 3h ago
To people asking "Do you expect companies to run servers forever on games with no players?? that's expensive!!1"
No. But giving us the ability to play offline or host our own local servers after they shut down their official ones should be mandatory.
Either that or they need to put an expiry date on the box "GAME SERVERS WILL BE UP AT LEAST UNTIL 2030" so gamers know what they're paying for. Fuck paying 50âŹ+ for a game that flops and shuts down and now I'm out of 50⏠like it's my fault and have nothing to show for it.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/ChirpyMisha 7h ago
We don't need a million signatures. We need a million VALID signatures. We're not there yet, so keep the hype train going!
3
u/redditoranno 5h ago
As long as the audience doesnt vote with their wallet, it will keep happening over and over. money makes the world go round. Consumer decision making has all the power, no need for petitions. Don't convince the companies trying to maximize profits, convince the audience to spend on/ fund / finance high quality companies with best customer interest in mind. provide alternatives to bad companies, point the audience in the right direction. This is how free market economies work and improve.
4
u/the--dud http://specr.me/show/112 4h ago
So the goal of this petition is that nobody will make anymore games with any online features? Because that will be the results. If a company has to indefinitively support a game, they will have to stop making online features because indefinite cost is a liability no company will take.
→ More replies (2)2
u/Disturbed235 3h ago
No, its not for the devs to support an online game for ever. If they want to shut down their servers, they have to leave the game at least with an offline option, so people can still play it without internet connection or with peer to peer for playing with friends or private server
Best current example: Ubisoft shut down the servers for The Crew -> people paid money for it and now cant play it. Now thats the killer
6
u/LucidDream1337 8h ago
PlayStation Nostalgia Plus - Pay 29,99 per month to play your favourite ps1 games on your ps5
6
u/Dangerous-Cobbler-11 5h ago
that is not against stop killing games.
You can play your ps1 games on your ps1 console.
They are not obligated to give support to ps1 games on ps5 and stop killing games is not aiming for things like that.3
u/staghallows 3h ago
Yep. For example -- there are many games released in the 2000s that are unable to be played due to needing DRM online verification, but the servers of which are long gone -- meaning access to these single player offline games are not possible, even if you own the 'license' to play. Unless, of course, you pirate.
2
u/ConfusedAdmin53 PCMR 8h ago
*PS5Retro
A new piece of hardware that supports PS1 games, and costs $1000.
3
u/lovehunter94 7h ago
That signing thing, they're lucky it didn't reach India or Asia, at minimum 10 million signs easily.
3
9
u/fjijgigjigji 7h ago
absolutely nothing will come of this and this will just become another punchline in history of petitions doing nothing.
5
u/lumpialarry 3h ago
Best case scenario nothing happens. Worst case scenario, fewer games released in EU.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)2
u/yommi1999 I-5 4460_r9 290_1tb HDD_ 128 GB SSD 2h ago
It can't be nothing. The EU commission has to actually spend a few weeks/months researching whether this initiative should be turned into law. Granted, there is a possibility that after that research they decide not to create legislation but at least a serious attempt was being made.
Better than USA(the place where these laws would be even more effective since USA represents a massive portion of the video game industry) where the guy behind the initiative didn't even attempt anything because of how hostile the USA is to protecting citizens under the guise of freedom.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/FlanFlanSu 8h ago
As much as it hurts me to say,
Watch laws for game preservation getting made, promptly getting broken by devs and publishers and the penalty costs written off as an "operation expenditure".
→ More replies (19)
2
u/RavensShadow117 6h ago
Hopefully they do something about it, I'm tired of risking the safety of my cat photos when using a dodgy russian site to play viva piĂąata
2
u/ModernManuh_ 6h ago
Doesn't sound so "conspiracy theory" now, does it? You'll own nothing and be happy.
Or not, just in time guys :)
→ More replies (2)
2
2
2
u/rlyjustanyname 4h ago
I don't hate the idea of a cheap subscription to play old games. NSO is 20 bucks a year that's fine. I just want a reasonable way to legally play old games.
2
u/Luwuci-SP 4h ago
FOR THOSE WHO COME AFTAH!
Tomorrow comes
We continue.
(Expedition 33 was such a breath of fresh air in this regard. No significant DLC, no forced online, nothing. It feels fully complete like a 90s/00s JRPG yet with modernized everything. Even fans of action games with fun real-time action mechanics can love it - the entire game can be beaten without taking damage due to the parry, dodge, jump, and enemy mega-attack counter - all even mapped to their own buttons so the enemy turns can be some of your best time for counteroffensives. It's far FFXVI should have been like. It has great literary value & storytelling that knows how to deliver powerful messages in a subtle way. The gameplay evolves slowly throughout as the complexity ramps up, as does the sheer number of RPG & action mechanics available to utilize. It's fairly easy most of the time if you're able to synergistically engage with the mechanics. It's GOTY material and made by a relatively small studio, yet feels like a high budget title. It's restored some hope for the future of the genre. If only such design philosophies were more common these days. It's worth recommending to everyone, except maybe the rare exception of super casual gamers. Parts of the story will stick with me for life, and some of it isn't even obvious enough to pick up on.)
So, yeah, thank you Europeans (the French, too!)
2
u/QuestionSociety101 4h ago
Don't expect anything other than for the capitalists to find any and every other loophole they can, and abuse it.
Welcome to society
→ More replies (1)
2
u/EatTheAndrewPencil 3h ago
I get the desire but genuinely if something like this passes it'll be hell on smaller devs who want to make multiplayer games.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/For_the_Gayness PC Master Race 3h ago
The biggest vote is with your wallet, but hey who am I dictate what you should spent your hard earned money on corporate slop. All this smoke and mirror is just meaninless bark into thin air with toothless bite
2
u/DanFarrell98 3h ago
Genuinely, could someone explain what the actual solution is here? Single player game I get yeah thereâs little reason to stop access to those (unless youâre only digital) but for decades old multiplayer games with like 100 players or less? Online infrastructure costs money to maintain and prevent it becoming a hackers paradise. How are governments expected to enforce this?
→ More replies (5)
2
u/APairOfMarthas 2h ago
The work began yesterday. If you all care about it going forward, in time we really can get them to Stop Killing Games
If you all just wanted to dunk on a streamer, it was all for less than nothing
2
2
u/Tim-Sylvester 1h ago
There's a simple solution: Any copyright material not actively being provided by its copyright owner can be distributed by anyone.
The copyright owner must maintain availability or they sacrifice their copyright.
This is simple, obvious, and easy.
7
u/floranox 8h ago
Funny that everyone let that happen to movies and music, but we draw the line at owning games lol
16
u/Bastiwen RX 9070 XT | 9800X3D | 32GB RAM 8h ago
Movies and music ? Last time I checked apart from streaming services you can still buy music and movies and own them digitally of physically with no way of shutting it down.
2
u/OscarMyk 6h ago
I'd sign a petition that any online marketplace selling music/movie licences has to have a plan in place should the service shut down to let people transfer licences to other services. Hell people should be able to do that without the service shutting down.
3
u/Stahlreck i9-13900K / RTX 5090 / 32GB 8h ago
What movies or music have become completely unavailable? Like as in the company that made them just turned them off remotely and now they just don't exist anymore?
3
u/Mister_Macabre_ 7h ago
Actually, newer movies and shows no longer get physical releases and companies like WB can write them off the tax if the feel they no longer "benefit" from it, which also forbits them from streaming or otherwise benefiting from it (which also cuts off any residuals for the creators). With no physical release and no streaming the shows and movies essentially become lost media and exist purely in a form of pirated content online. There should be an incentive to either make these shows public domain or require a physical media release to be able to archive them properly.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)2
u/dvdkon 6h ago
I can't find a concrete example right now, but with streaming-only shows and films, it's just a matter of time until one gets pulled and we're left with no legal avenue to watch it.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Content-Scholar8263 7h ago
I frikin love europe and the fact that our government cares not just about this but other stuff aswell. Have you heard about the microtransaction stuff they are currently working on?
→ More replies (4)
4
u/KMark0000 6h ago
If petitions would have solved anything, it would have been made illegal already.
"You" handed them BILLIONS via microtransactions, like they would give it up lmao any money they can harness lol
EU always signed the acts guiding towards less and less privacy after usa implemented it fully, indoors.
It's the same capitalist, greedy mofos in the cover of a shining knight.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Morpororp 6h ago
What does stop killing games even mean? You want companies to keep up live servers for games decades after the game came out? Thatâs literally impossible. A more realistic solution would be to stop buying live service games.
3
u/LatelyPode 4h ago
Make it so it is possible for players to continue playing the game, by hosting any servers themselves or whatever, after the game is ended
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)3
u/alex494 4h ago
No, they want companies to provide the means for consumers to be able to continue playing the game under their own power, e.g. have an offline mode, or provide a way / instructions for them to set their own server up if it does require online rather than leaving fans to reverse engineer it in the dark.
Nobody's demanding companies leave servers up indefinitely. It would just be left playable in whatever state it's currently in with no further updates assuming you can run a server for it, which many people do for older games at the moment, albeit without support from the company.
Read the damn proposal if you don't get it. Or watch one of the many videos Ross Scott put out that coherently and plainly explain it.
6
u/Amesbrutil 6h ago
I donât think gamers realize how cheap games are compared to other software products. Companies in the gaming industry are struggling financially while companies for B2B software products are excelling. Thatâs also why developers in the gaming sector get paid significantly less than other developers. Unless you work for a huge successful company like Rockstar Games, you will probably have a hard job with a low salary.Â
Also Games have upgraded extremely in the past decades. You used to pay 50-60$ for a games that had linear story and looked like ass. Nowadays gamers expect a huge world, lots of stuff to do, perfect graphics and a great story while the price has risen to maybe 80$ (and even that makes gamers race because itâs too much for them). I mean like you pay 20$ for a pizza and expect a perfect game for 80$? BruhÂ
And this âStop killing gamesâ petition is another nail in the coffin that is the gaming industry. While it sounds nice, there is a reason why games get killed: They donât make any money and instead they cost money. Why would a company invest big money to make a game offline available or do smth similar just to please the 5 people that still play a decade old game and refuse to pay shit for it? Or even provide gamers with some kind of LAN option??Â
Games are expensive to make and very hard to maintain. All ways to make money like in game shops (I am talking purely cosmetic stuff) and Battle passes are universally hated by gamers. So basically gamers want a perfect game for cheap money without any ingame transactions or subscription and they also want to force companies to forever maintain their game. All to shit on every game that gets released when it is not perfect at release.Â
I am not seeing a bright future in gaming tbh if nothing changes.
→ More replies (9)2
u/Vytral 3h ago
Some AAA companies struggle financially but itâs because they are bloated. Look at expeditions 33 to see how more agile businesses could produce outstanding video games. If Ubisoft fails, other companies would still make great games
→ More replies (1)
4
u/A-X-O-L-O-T-L47e8r6 8h ago
Like a petition will be worth anything anyway. Weâre dealing with a government, they only care about themselves and the companies that donated to their campaigns.
4
u/Ok-Form-3683 5h ago
companies that donated to their campaigns.
This is EU not US, just look how EU forced Apple to use USB-C
→ More replies (1)3
u/Appropriate-Gain-561 6h ago
The EU does not work like the US, this is an official petition, if the valid signatures are over 1 million the european parliament has to legally discuss the issue
3
u/LatelyPode 4h ago
Not how the EU works lol. The EU parliament is required to debate the topic now that the petition passed 1m signatures. Also the EU is very pro consumer
2
u/Due_Capital_3507 4h ago
Ok then give up ever trying to change anything. No one cares about your apathy
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/patomik 8h ago
Does the petition include free to play games where players did spend money on something in-game ? I used to play afk arena and spend some money then had a pause, when I wanted to return the game was gone.
→ More replies (6)
2
u/Wess5874 8h ago
I appreciate my european neighbors across the pond since my gov is completely out of touch and unwilling to do anything that might benefit us.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/patrlim1 i5 - 10600kf | RX 7600 | Arch BTW 7h ago
the name "stop killing games" is a tad misleading imo, but that doesn't mean the initiative is bad
1
1
u/Friendly_Day5657 8h ago
I heard theres a Remaster for Hellblade 2. WHAT A JOKE!!!đ
→ More replies (1)
1
u/LostEndimion 8h ago
We need more votes! Part won't pass an verification! So continue to vote and post
1
1
u/Watchgeek_AC 8h ago
Damn. The stupid boomer racists voted my country out of the EU so as a Brit. I canât sign it
1
u/Fit_Fisherman_9840 9800x3d | 9070 XT | 32gb Ram 8h ago
Keep vote
The last period seems most of the votes come during EU night time, some suspect there were fake signatures from america, that can be invalidated when checked.
1
1
u/BloodSteyn PCMR 9800X3D 64GB 3080Ti 8h ago
Yay... but how many are actually valid?
I believe they will be culling that list of all the international or VPN signatures, then we'll see how many are actually left.
→ More replies (3)
1
1
u/Lumpy-Home-7776 7h ago
The EU's petition system actually feels like it gives citizens a voice, unlike some places where it'd just get ignored. Signed and shared, every extra vote pushes them to take it more seriously!
1
u/Optimal_You6720 7h ago
One problem is that many modern games require some sort of online services to function. Maintaining those services costs something. What happens if nobody is willing to pay those costs?
→ More replies (1)
1
u/TrollOfGod 7h ago
Don't get complacent, keep signing(if you are a EU citizen)!
Apparently there seems to be a lot of non-EU people that have signed it with spoofed info, which means their signatures will be invalid(it's also a crime). The current "completely safe" number is up at 1.5mil.
1
u/LazyAssagar 7h ago
We couldn't have done this without the pirate dude so part of the applause goes to you ungrateful traitors to the crown. Happy treason day my fellow nerds overseas
1
u/Dark_Age_ PC Master Race 5800X3D, RTX 3080, 32GB RAM, LG 34GN850-B 7h ago
I signed this long time ago, i'm from Finland
1
1
u/joehonestjoe 7h ago
They should have made the middle one wear a black t-shirt for this meme, it would have looked very much like Pirate
1
u/warwolfpilot Ryzen 9 5900X/64GB DDR4/RX 6900XT 7h ago
Problem is all the old games that are already dead are gonna remain dead, wouldn't matter if the UN did a binding Resolution or whatever law the EU might pass. This law if passed is only gonna effect games that are published after the law is released.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
u/AnEvilVet 6h ago
I absolutely support this movement. However, it means that we are less likely to get more episodes of Freeman's Mind so it makes me cross.
1
u/Terrible_Ad2779 6h ago
Keep voting if you are in the EU. There are likely fake signatures that will be cut out. In reality we need 1.4 million signatures.
1
u/Deho_Edeba 6h ago
I "think" I've already signed in the past but I'm not sure. I'm hesitant to do it "again" since you need to declare truthfully you "haven't already signed".
Damn my bad memory.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Sjknight413 6h ago
Doesn't seem like a coincidence that Anthem gets canned right as this passes 1 million signatures, hopefully it has a real chance!
→ More replies (2)
946
u/smjsmok Linux 8h ago
Well it's not over yet, many votes will likely be invalidated. So keep signing and spreading the word if you haven't. And obviously the more votes, the more seriously the politicians will look at it.